Tell Ghanaians Your Stance on Free SHS Bill – Afenyo-Markin berates Minority MPs

The Majority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, has called on the Minority caucus in parliament to declare their stance on the proposed Free Senior High School (Free SHS) Bill.

The Bill aims to regulate the Free SHS policy by making it mandatory for future governments to sustain the initiative.

Afenyo-Markin noted that the bill has received executive approval and will be presented to the house by the Education Minister, Dr. Yaw Osei Adutwum.

Addressing members of the Parliamentary Press Corps in Parliament on Tuesday, June 25, 2024, Afenyo-Markin emphasized the need for the Minority to explain their opposition to the bill.

“We have heard the Ranking Member on Education, the Honorable Member for Akatsi North, Peter Nortsu-Kotoe, strongly opposing the Free SHS bill. Clearly, the NDC minority doesn’t want to commit to the Free SHS, and the fact that we want to enact a law to make it mandatory.

“We have stated time without number that those provisions in the constitution that talk about Free SHS are very aspirational. The way to go is to enact a law to regulate the Free SHS policy, which is currently in operation.

“The NDC is opposed to this, and they have spoken through their ranking member. We want them to tell Ghanaians whether Free SHS is not their priority, as a responsible opposition.

He added, “The Ministry of Education is going to ferry the bill through to parliament. We’re ready and as part of the engagement process, we engaged them, but they are adamant. The NDC is not ready for the Free SHS bill. It’s clear, and their spokesperson on education has been clear. The last time I tried to tease the matter out on the floor, he avoided a response and stayed clear of it. He’s not ready to commit himself.

“We know that in Parliament, the caucus speaks through its spokesperson, and he’s the ranking member on education. He’s the NDC’s spokesperson on education, and he says he is opposed to the bill because of some provisions in the constitution. They should tell us why they oppose the bill.”