Ghana’s Looming Ecocide: The Perils of Galamsey and Unsustainable Mining
Dear Nyaaba,
I know, firsthand that you respected nature and i also know that your father, my great-grandfather viewed nature as an intrinsic part of the Creator God. You did not possess or need to possess words to explain to me the need to respect nature and to treat it with utmost care.
The story is markedly different today, Ghana is under siege from herself, and may well be taking active part in killing herself, an action that is termed ecocide. Sadly, while the transgression has a name, there is still no unanimity as to its criminality and thus constitutes, presently, only an idea around which to rally. I hope it becomes law yesterday, but if it is tomorrow, let not its claws be shackled by the very popular legal principle of laws not having retroactive effect. But i digress. Ghana is in dire straits, and this is why.
Ghana, a country celebrated for its rich cultural heritage and natural resources, is facing an environmental crisis that may amount to ecocide. This crisis arises from the unchecked proliferation of illegal small-scale mining, popularly known as galamsey.
Over the last decade, galamsey has spiraled out of control, leaving in its wake environmental degradation of alarming proportions. If this practice continues unchecked, Ghana risks not only losing its precious ecosystems but also becoming a case study in how short-term economic gains can lead to long-term ecological catastrophe.
Galamsey: A Threat to Ecosystems
Galamsey refers to the illegal and artisanal mining activities that have become rampant across Ghana, especially in mineral-rich regions. While mining itself has always been a cornerstone of Ghana’s economy, illegal mining, which is largely unregulated and unsustainable, poses a direct threat to the country’s environment.
Unlike large-scale mining operations that are subject to legal scrutiny, galamsey operators exploit the land without consideration for environmental laws, creating irreparable harm to the country’s ecosystems.
The damage caused by galamsey is far-reaching:
Deforestation: Vast expanses of forest cover have been cleared to make way for mining activities. These areas, once rich in biodiversity, are now wastelands of barren land and contaminated water bodies.
Water Pollution: One of the most alarming impacts of galamsey is the pollution of rivers and water bodies. The use of toxic chemicals such as mercury and cyanide in the extraction process has led to severe contamination of rivers that provide water for agriculture and human consumption. Major rivers such as the Pra and Offin have become toxic waste zones, threatening both aquatic life and human health.
Soil Degradation: The mining activities disturb soil structure, making the land infertile and unfit for agriculture, which is critical to the livelihoods of many Ghanaians. In the long run, this could threaten food security in regions dependent on subsistence farming.
Loss of Biodiversity: Ghana’s forests and rivers are home to a wide variety of plant and animal species. The destruction of their habitats through mining activities threatens the delicate balance of these ecosystems, pushing some species to the brink of extinction.
Ecocide: A Legal and Moral Perspective
The term ecocide refers to the mass destruction of the environment by human activity. While it is yet to be recognized as an international crime akin to genocide, there is a growing movement to elevate it to that status due to the irreparable damage caused to the planet. In Ghana’s case, the scale and impact of galamsey arguably fits the definition of ecocide.
By allowing these illegal mining activities to continue without adequate regulation or enforcement, Ghana may well be complicit in the destruction of its own environment. If the devastation caused by galamsey is not curtailed, future generations will inherit a land devoid of forests, poisoned rivers, and depleted mineral resources.
The Government’s Role and Responsibility
Successive governments have pledged to tackle galamsey, but the results have been mixed at best. Initiatives such as Operation Vanguard, launched in 2017, saw the deployment of security forces to crack down on illegal miners. However, the effectiveness of these operations has been hindered by corruption, lack of political will, and the deep entrenchment of mining in local economies. Many argue that despite these efforts, the benefits of galamsey outweigh the risks for local communities reliant on the mining economy, further complicating efforts to curb it.
What is clear, however, is that government inaction or insufficient action is exacerbating the crisis. By not enforcing stricter environmental regulations or holding perpetrators accountable, the government risks being seen as complicit in the destruction of Ghana’s ecosystems. This moral and legal failure opens the possibility of considering Ghana’s actions—or lack thereof—as contributing to ecocide.
Conclusion
Ghana stands at a crossroads. The allure of quick profits from galamsey threatens to overshadow the long-term consequences of environmental degradation. If decisive action is not taken soon, the country may well be guilty of ecocide, a crime with profound consequences for both the people and the planet. The time for half measures is over—Ghana must act now to protect its environment, or it will pay a steep price in the future.
Kasise Ricky Peprah
About Author
