Time for Leadership in Parliament
…Calls for Bernard Ahiafor to Step Up or Step Down
In the wake of a chaotic incident in Parliament that has sparked widespread barbarity, the limelight has turned to Bernard Ahiafor, the Chairman of the Appointments Committee and First Deputy Speaker. Critics argue that his failure to maintain order during the vetting process reflects a troubling lapse in leadership, raising serious questions about his ability to effectively preside over the House of 276 members.
As the public clamours for accountability, many are calling for Ahiafor to either step down from his position or significantly improve his leadership skills.
The recent altercation in Parliament, broadcast live for all to see, was not just a minor disruption; it was a glaring signal of deeper issues within the legislative body. Observers noted that if Ahiafor could not manage a small committee effectively, he might not be equipped to lead the entire Parliament. His handling of the situation has left constituents feeling betrayed and disillusioned, as the elected representatives, who are supposed to embody respect and decorum, instead showcased disarray.
Ahiafor’s prior association with the New Patriotic Party (NPP) has also come under scrutiny. Critics suggest that his past affiliation may have clouded his judgment, allowing fellow party member Alexander Afenyo-Markin to dominate proceedings instead of asserting his authority as Chairman. Afenyo-Markin, who has been vocal about his intention to ramp up opposition to the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC), made headlines just a day before the incident by stating that the majority had yet to see his “worst side.” This statement, along with the chaos that ensued, raises concerns about the dynamics within Parliament and the ability of its leaders to maintain order.
Ahiafor’s leadership and decision-making during the incident have led many to question whether he has the fortitude required for such a critical role. By failing to call in the Marshall to restore order, he missed an opportunity to demonstrate strong leadership and uphold the dignity of Parliament. Instead, his inaction contributed to an environment where disorder reigned, further eroding public trust in the legislative process.
Calls for Ahiafor to resign have intensified, with citizens and commentators alike arguing that if he cannot handle the responsibilities of his current role, he should step aside. The general sentiment is that leadership requires not only the ability to preside over sessions but also the courage to enforce rules and maintain decorum, even in the face of opposition from fellow party members. Many believe that Ahiafor’s reluctance to take decisive action is indicative of a broader issue within the parliamentary leadership that must be addressed to restore confidence in the institution.
The public’s frustration is palpable. Many Ghanaians are left wondering how their elected officials can engage in such behavior without facing consequences. The expectation is that MPs, as representatives of the people, should conduct themselves with the utmost respect for the offices they hold and the citizens they serve. By failing to do so, they not only diminish their own credibility but also undermine the integrity of the entire democratic process.
Afenyo-Markin’s recent comments have added fuel to the fire. While he claims to be allowing the NDC government some breathing room, his hints at stronger opposition suggest a potential for further discord in Parliament. If Afenyo-Markin believes he can freely express his frustrations while Ahiafor remains passive, this dynamic could lead to more chaotic sessions in the future. As the leader of the minority, Afenyo-Markin should be working towards constructive dialogue rather than fostering an environment of conflict.
The time has come for Ahiafor to reflect on his capabilities as a leader. He must either step up his game and take full responsibility for his role or consider stepping down to allow someone more capable to take the reins. The Parliament of Ghana deserves a leader who can effectively manage discussions, maintain order, and uphold the dignity of the institution.
Moreover, the incident serves as a wake-up call for the entire Parliament to reassess its leadership and accountability mechanisms. It is essential that MPs understand the weight of their responsibilities and the impact their behavior has on public perception. An effective parliamentary system relies not only on the laws and policies enacted but also on the integrity and professionalism of those who create and uphold them.
As discussions continue about improving parliamentary conduct, there are calls for the establishment of clearer protocols for managing disputes and maintaining order during sessions. Leadership must be proactive in addressing issues before they escalate, and MPs must be held accountable for their actions.
In conclusion, the recent chaos in Parliament has laid bare the shortcomings of its leadership, particularly that of Bernard Ahiafor. The calls for him to either step up or step down reflect a broader demand for accountability and professionalism within Ghana’s legislative body. As citizens look to their elected representatives for guidance and leadership, it is imperative that those in power rise to the occasion and restore faith in the democratic process. The time for action is now; Parliament must not only lead by example but also ensure that respect and decorum are at the forefront of its operations.
Source: Innocent Samuel Apiah
About Author
