NPP Crackdown on Dissent Sparks Outrage
…Adwoa Sarfo’s Silencing Exposes the Party’s Authoritarian Tendencies
In a move that has sent shockwaves through Ghana’s political landscape, the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP) has taken drastic measures to silence one of its own, former Member of Parliament Adwoa Sarfo. The party’s leadership, clearly threatened by Sarfo’s vocal criticism, has resorted to strong-arm tactics to prevent her from speaking out about the internal turmoil plaguing the NPP.
This latest episode has not only raised concerns about the state of democracy within the party but has also laid bare the NPP’s authoritarian tendencies, which many believe have been simmering beneath the surface for years.
Adwoa Sarfo, a former Deputy Majority Leader and Minister, has been a thorn in the side of the NPP’s top brass for some time now. Her uncompromising stance and willingness to publicly criticize the party’s shortcomings have made her a target for the party’s leadership, who seem intent on quashing any dissent within their ranks.
The Silencing of a Dissenting Voice
According to reports, Sarfo was set to grant an interview to Kessben FM, where she was expected to make “bombshell” revelations about the inner workings of the NPP. However, just as she was about to leave her home, a convoy of three V8 vehicles carrying top party officials arrived and blocked her from reaching the radio station.
This brazen attempt to prevent Sarfo from speaking out has been met with widespread condemnation from political observers and the public. The party’s decision to subsequently refer her to the Disciplinary Committee has been widely interpreted as a calculated move to silence a dissenting voice and maintain a facade of unity.
Adwoa Sarfo’s Outspoken Criticism
Sarfo’s criticisms of the NPP have been nothing short of scathing. In her previous media appearances, she has not hesitated to address the party’s internal divisions, mismanagement, and lack of accountability.
One of her most pointed criticisms has been the NPP’s reluctance to engage in genuine self-reflection in the aftermath of their 2024 electoral defeat. Sarfo has been vocal about the need for the party to undergo a comprehensive review of its policies, decision-making processes, and leadership structure in order to regain the trust of the Ghanaian electorate.
Furthermore, Sarfo has highlighted the party’s tendency to suppress dissenting voices, drawing parallels to the case of former General Secretary Justin Frempong Kodua, who was also silenced after openly lamenting the NPP’s electoral loss.
The Implications of the NPP’s Actions
The NPP’s heavy-handed response to Adwoa Sarfo’s criticism has raised serious concerns about the party’s commitment to democratic principles. By resorting to such tactics, the party leadership is sending a chilling message to its members and the broader public that dissent will not be tolerated.

Political analysts have argued that the NPP’s actions undermine the very foundations of a healthy democracy, where open discourse and the free exchange of ideas are essential. The party’s decision to refer Sarfo to the Disciplinary Committee has been widely seen as a blatant attempt to stifle criticism and maintain a facade of unity, even at the expense of internal accountability.
The Looming Crossroads for the NPP
As the NPP grapples with the aftermath of their 2024 electoral defeat, the party finds itself at a critical juncture. The choice before them is clear: they can either embrace the opportunity for genuine introspection and reform, or they can continue down the path of repression and the consolidation of power.
The silencing of Adwoa Sarfo is a stark reminder that the NPP’s leadership is more concerned with preserving its own grip on power than addressing the legitimate concerns of its members and the Ghanaian public. This approach, however, is ultimately unsustainable and will only serve to further erode the party’s credibility and public trust.
Ghanaians are watching closely, and they expect their political leaders to uphold the values of democracy, transparency, and accountability. The NPP’s actions have called these values into question, and the party must now make a choice that will define its future and the future of the nation.
Moving Forward: The Path to Redemption
If the NPP is to regain the trust of the Ghanaian people, it must heed the lessons of the past and chart a new course that prioritizes internal reform and a genuine commitment to democratic principles.
This will require the party’s leadership to engage in a painful, but necessary, process of self-reflection. They must be willing to confront their own shortcomings, address the concerns raised by figures like Adwoa Sarfo, and implement meaningful changes that demonstrate a true dedication to transparency and accountability.
Failure to do so will not only jeopardize the NPP’s future but will also have far-reaching implications for Ghana’s democratic institutions. The silencing of dissenting voices is a slippery slope that must be halted before it erodes the very foundations of the country’s vibrant political landscape.
The choice before the NPP is clear: they can either embrace the path of reform and renewal, or they can continue down the road of authoritarian tendencies and the suppression of critical voices. The future of the party, and indeed the nation, hangs in the balance.