RETHINKING RETIREMENT: ENGAGING THE WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE FOR OUR NATION’S PROSPERITY.
The age-old tradition of retiring at 60 has long been ingrained in many societies, including ours. But as the world evolves, so too must our approach to retirement.
In a rapidly changing global landscape, it is no longer sufficient to usher individuals into retirement merely because they have reached an arbitrary age. Neither should we be shooing them away ostensibly to make way for the younger ones as though we are incapable of building a larger economy that can absorb more hands. The wealth of knowledge, expertise, and experience amassed over decades is an invaluable resource that should not be discarded at the threshold of retirement. It is time we rethink the current retirement paradigm and open up avenues for retirees to continue contributing meaningfully to our nation’s growth. In Japan, the official retirement age is 65. However, many people continue to work beyond this age, especially if they are in good health or wish to remain active. The government has been encouraging people to work longer due to the aging population and labor shortages. Admittedly Ghana is not facing those same challenges but is arguably on the threshold of enlarging her economy, which is long overdue, and thus will need the necessary blend of youthful passion and seasoned expertise. Additionally, in Japan, some companies have policies that allow employees to work until they are 70 or beyond. Truth be told, the version of such policy that is practiced in Ghana does not enjoy the trust of many. Accusations are rife that the basis for such contracts are shrouded in controversy. Some intimate that contracts are dished out as reward for loyalty or as means to block the chance of a not too friendly next-in-line. Whether or not these insinuations are baseless or grounded, the situation can be improved to make the processes and criteria more transparent.
We are living in an age where the pace of change is unprecedented, where innovation and the application of knowledge can determine the trajectory of a nation. In such a landscape, the deep reservoir of knowledge and expertise held by retirees is a treasure trove waiting to be tapped. These individuals have lived through decades of change, shaped industries, guided organizations, and solved problems that were once considered insurmountable. They carry insights that are often irreplaceable, having witnessed the evolution of industries and the transformation of societies. They constitute the institutional memory of the industry called Ghana.
This experience is not just useful; it is essential. In an era of rapid technological advancements and complex global challenges, the ability to blend seasoned judgment with new ideas is what will make the difference between a nation that thrives and one that falters. Retirees, with their vast wealth of experience, are the bridge between traditional knowledge and modern innovation. Allowing them to retire at 60, without leveraging their potential for further national contributions, is akin to throwing away a priceless asset when it could be put to the service of national progress.
In the past, reaching 60 was considered a significant milestone. Life expectancy was shorter, and many believed that the later years of life should be dedicated to rest and leisure. However, in today’s world, this concept no longer holds true. Life expectancy has increased dramatically, and many retirees are healthier, more active, and more capable than ever before. In fact, many find themselves with years of vitality and a passion to continue contributing to society. Yet, societal expectations often push them out of the workforce, forcing them into an enforced retirement that they neither need nor desire.
Moreover, the economic realities of today demand that we reconsider the fixed age of retirement. With increasing longevity, pension systems are under strain, and the financial burden on the younger working generation continues to rise. By retaining retirees in the workforce, we can ease this burden while also benefiting from their wealth of knowledge. They can act as mentors, advisors, and even catalysts for innovation, all while continuing to contribute to their personal financial security and that of the nation.
Rather than viewing retirement as an end, we must see it as a transition, a new phase where retirees can continue to add value in ways that align with their experience and capabilities. This means creating opportunities for them to stay engaged with the workforce in flexible, part-time, or advisory roles. These opportunities should not be limited to high-ranking officials or experts in the corporate world but should also extend to those who have honed skills in public service, education, healthcare, and many other fields.
Retirees can serve as mentors to younger generations, transferring invaluable skills that cannot be learned in textbooks. They can contribute to strategic decision-making processes, providing insights based on decades of practical experience. Their involvement in policy discussions, project execution, and community development can provide a unique perspective that helps avoid the pitfalls that come with a purely youthful, unseasoned approach to problem-solving.
Additionally, retirees can play a pivotal role in driving social change and continuity in times of crisis. Their resilience, perspective, and leadership abilities are qualities that can help steer communities through periods of uncertainty. Retirees who remain engaged with the workforce can act as stabilizing forces during turbulent times, offering expertise to guide decision-makers and help shape solutions.
It is time to challenge the idea that 60 is the definitive end of an individual’s productive career. While it is important to recognize the physical and mental demands that come with age, we must also acknowledge that every person’s ability to contribute is unique. Rather than imposing a rigid retirement age, the nation must embrace a flexible, personalized approach to retirement. Some individuals may wish to retire fully, while others may want to continue working in a reduced capacity or take on new roles that fit their changing needs and abilities.
Rather than setting an arbitrary retirement age, the focus should shift to a more holistic approach—considering the health, desire, and ability of the individual. Policies should support gradual transitions, providing the flexibility for retirees to scale down their work commitments or shift to roles that require less physical strain, but still capitalize on their vast knowledge and experience. This could include roles as consultants, board members, or community leaders.
Furthermore, pension systems should be restructured to reward those who choose to continue working beyond the traditional retirement age. Offering tax incentives, financial bonuses, or additional retirement savings for those who choose to remain engaged can incentivize older workers to contribute, while also alleviating the strain on public pension systems.
In conclusion, the time has come to rethink how we view retirement. Retirees represent a vast pool of untapped knowledge, experience, and skills that can continue to benefit society long after the age of 60. By embracing a flexible approach to retirement, one that allows individuals to continue contributing in meaningful ways, we can create a more prosperous, resilient nation. The current retirement age of 60 is an outdated construct that no longer serves the needs of a modern society. It is in the best interest of our country to engage retirees in their retirement years, ensuring that their knowledge and expertise continue to shape the future of our nation. Rather than allowing them to fade into obscurity, we must empower retirees to remain relevant, valued, and engaged. In doing so, we honor not just their contributions, but our nation’s potential for greater success. The wealth of knowledge and experience amassed over a lifetime is too valuable to be discarded, let us use it to forge a brighter, more innovative future.
Source: KASISE RICKY PEPRAH